Friday, February 25, 2011

A Time To Build And A Time To Tear Down.


I think shoddy build quality is completely unacceptable in the age of micro-electronic. There! I said it. I am not ashamed to wave Quality’s flag on my blog.

At any given time, the U.S. consumer electronics market seems flooded with low-quality, low cost consumer electronics produced with poor components and the bare minimum of workmanship.

I hate sounding like one of those people; you know them, the kind of people who complain about good things. Believe me when I say that never before in the history of mankind has the consumer had it so good when it comes to affordable technology. Prices on things like CPUs, hard disk storage, RAM, video graphics, MP3 players, etc. etc. have never been as cheap as they are now. However, there is a downside to all of this abundance; poor quality in a great many products we, the nerds of the universe, tend to buy…

I came across this article at eweek this morning: http://www.eweek.com/c/a/Desktops-and-Notebooks/Apple-MacBook-Pro-Teardown-Finds-Improved-Wireless-Quality-Complaints-542596/

Just thought I would point out some choice highlights from the iFixit teardown of the 2011 MacBook Pro:

Later, though, the (iFixit) team uncovered what looks like toothpaste blobs. "Holy thermal paste! Time will tell if the gobs of thermal paste applied to the CPU and GPU will cause overheating issues down the road," wrote iFixit, coming across the first issue to make it wonder whether Apple is having some quality control issues.

Come on Apple, really? Blobs of thermal paste haphazardly splattered on the CPU and GPU? I know Foxconn has a reputation for driving its employees to suicide, but this is ridiculous! Okay, okay, I made that joke in poor taste. I’m sorry.

As if the amateurish application of thermal compound to the most critical (critical, because the logic board contained in the MBP is non-serviceable and costs nearly as much as a new laptop itself) components of the new MBP wasn't enough, iFixit also detailed another disturbing problem.

The team also discovered a stripped screw near the subwoofer enclosure and an "unlocked ZIF socket for the IR sensor," two things, said iFixit, that should not be found inside a completely unmolested computer with an $1,800 base price.

I couldn’t agree more with iFixit’s assessment. There is absolutely no excuse for a company like Apple, which prides its reputation for aesthetics and design, to ship products that have stripped screws.


I honestly question what the suits in such companies are thinking? Perhaps they’ve grown savvy to the apathy of the masses. Or perhaps slapping a one-year warranty on a $1,800.00USD piece of equipment creates a false sense of security because they know that you and I (aka The Consumer) might feel a strong compulsion to purchase an Applecare service plan at the ridiculous price of $250.00 for three years of extortion, errpp, I mean "protection". Regardless, I think it’s high time that we, as consumers, hold these companies responsible for what they ship. 


In the end it is up to each one of us to vote with our wallets. We must entertain the idea of paying a tad bit more to a company that values quality and craftsmanship as diligently as it pursues innovation in the unceasing quest to increase the bottom line. 



Friday, February 11, 2011

I'm In Love With A Roku...

There is a lot to love about the little black box named Roku.

The last few days have been a revelation of sorts; I have rediscovered the fact that I love television. Never, in my life, have I watched as much television as I have since purchasing my Roku XDS.

Pros:

+ Size: It’s small, very, very small; even smaller than a CD case.

+ Apps: Roku has tons of free apps including Amazon On Demand, Netflix, Vimeo and Hulu Plus.

+ Build Quality: Seems like a fairly well built device to me. The remote control is excellent with nice rubberized buttons.

+ Image Quality: High definition content really pops on my Vizio 37” LCD television. My television is a 1080i device (I’ve set my XDS to transmit a 720p signal), but that doesn’t stop the little black box from streaming up beautiful images. Although Roku claims 1080p compatibility, I have my doubts about this device's ability to keep up. Oh yeah, the XDS definitely won't replace your Blu-Ray player either. Nevertheless, the XDS is good: very, very good.

+ Wireless: Dual-band wireless adapter. 2.4/5Ghz gives you some flexibility when connecting to your wireless router. Unfortunately, my mixed mode network is running at “G” speeds most of the time. Not the XDS’ fault…

+ USB Port: Allows you to connect and play various media through built-in USB port. Yay!


Cons:

+ Heat: Supposedly the XDS consumes 5-6 watts in standby mode. The little guy gets fairly warm when idle. I suspect the RAM chips to be the culprit. No active cooling, or even passive cooling, just the bare board and a honey-combed top-cover…

+ Mystery Hardware: The decoder chip has been identified, as has the RAM, but the wireless chip is still a mystery. Roku doesn’t seem forthcoming with “hard specs”.

+ Wireless: I had trouble connecting the XDS to my network initially, but this was my fault. Upon resuming from standby mode, the XDS’ wireless chip seems to need a bit of time to “catch-up”. Video quality seems to suffer…

+ Off/On Switch: None, as in, the XDS lacks a On/Off switch. I am a big believer in powering down devices when they are not in use, so the lack of a physical hardware switch is somewhat disturbing to me. However, I could easily remedy this problem by powering down my surge protector…

+ Pay To Play: Gotta play for Netflix, Hulu Plus and Amazon. While a good deal of content can be had for free, the premium stuff costs money. This ain't Kansas anymore Dorothy!


So in summary, the Roku Box XDS is a great little device and well worth the $99.99USD I paid for it. Take into account the affordable nature of both Netflix and Hulu Plus and the fact that any content you choose to purchase using Amazon is yours to keep and you simply can’t go wrong with this amazing little device!

Back are the days when I come home and actually look forward to watching some television!




Wednesday, February 02, 2011

Yay! More Android Stupidity...

http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,2817,2379264,00.asp

Just read the above interesting article from the guys at PC Mag about the further fragmentation of the Android platform and the fact that the current generation of iPad hardware can't keep up with the Tegra II platform in the soon-to-be-released Xoom tablet.

Really? The iPad's hardware is technologically inferior to a device that hasn't even been released yet, running an operating system that, likewise, has yet to be released?

Yeah, I think anybody who keeps up with the technology is well aware of the current iPad's specs. The other quality device (and I stress the word quality), Samsung's Galaxy Tab, currently runs a single core processor clocked at 1Ghz. The difference between the two devices is a relatively small 256MB of system memory, operating system and approximately 2.8" of screen size.

This quote tickled me:

Executives at War Drum Studios, which works next door to Trendy in Gainesville, Florida, also praised the new Android tablet. "Great Battles: Medieval" looks quite a bit like the "Total War" series of games, with individual soldiers battling on a 3D battlefield. In the demonstration War Drum showed off, over 500 individual soldiers were modeled on the battlefield, with no redundant animations, said Thomas Williamson, the company's chief executive. In total, there are probably about 300,000 to 400,000 polygons, he said.

And would his game run on the iPad? "No way, no way," Williamson said. "If this ran on the current generation iPad, it would be about 2, 3 frames per second".

Williamson said that Google's Android facilitates games updates as it allows incremental updates that can written to an SD card. New iOS builds must be essentially zipped up into a new build, he said.


So, to summarize, this guy doesn't think that his company's game, which is currently in development for an as-yet-unreleased build of Android would run on a soon-to-be-released tablet device that reportedly has twice the "power" (whatever that means, I guess they're referring to core count, RAM and gpu horsepower specifically) of a piece of hardware that is approximately one year old.

Thank you for stating the obvious Captain Williamson...

Please note my response to the sheer stupidity of this article:

So let me get this straight. The future of Android is in games? Wait, I thought Android was an operating system that powered small cellular communications devices?

Does this mean that "Honeycomb" is yet another iteration of the Android platform? I'm confused and thats the biggest knock against Android. It's schizophrenic and it doesn't know what it is. It has plenty of other issues too (like generally poor performance when stacked up against its "iOS" rival), not to mention the fact that Android developers (God bless em') are going to have to implement a "minimum spec" requirement.

This is where I saw Android going when it first began fragmenting and honestly, this is where Android is going to bury itself if Google doesn't get a handle on the situation quick, fast and in a hurry.

Imagine buying your brand spanking new Tegra II based tablet to play the latest game only to find out that your device just barely meets the minimum spec. Then, with high hopes, you download the game only to find that it performs poorly. What do you do then? Buy a new $800.00 Xoom tablet to run the latest Android game? These devices aren't PCs and you just can't pop them open and plug in more memory, a new processor or video-card.

Potential problems like these (which leave the consumer out in the cold) do not bode well for the development of the Android platform, nor do they speak well about the responsibility Google claims it has to it's customers. Remember fellas, do no evil!


Thanks for listening to my rant, check out PC Mag's article and offer your own opinion about the subject!